A rating for every customer
The FSA expects a customer risk assessment for every customer, not only those who look unusual. Ratings are produced consistently across the whole book from the factors you set.
Rate every customer and entity against the factors your business faces in Japan, let the rating drive due diligence and review frequency, and show how each rating was reached.
Last updated
What this covers
Screening in production for
The FSA guidelines judge compliance on effectiveness, not on whether a procedure document exists, and they tie review frequency and due diligence to risk. That makes the rating the hinge of the whole programme: it has to be applied to every customer, respond to new information, and show its working. A rating held in a spreadsheet and revisited once a year does none of those.
Customer risk assessment in JapanThe FSA expects a customer risk assessment for every customer, not only those who look unusual. Ratings are produced consistently across the whole book from the factors you set.
Weight geography, product, channel, customer type and screening results to your own risk assessment, including designated countries and foreign PEP exposure.
A higher rating triggers enhanced due diligence, tighter monitoring thresholds and more frequent review, which is the proportionate response the FSA guidelines describe.
The guidelines ask whether other customers with similar attributes should receive a stricter rating. Ratings can be re-run across comparable customers when one is rated up.
Each rating records the factors and weights behind it, so a reviewer or supervisor can see how it was reached.
Yes. The FSA requires a customer risk assessment for every customer, and a firm that identifies a risk in its own business, such as domestic political exposure, is expected to mitigate it.
The Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds sets what must be done: verification, records and suspicious transaction reports. The FSA guidelines set how the supervisor judges whether it was done well, through a risk-based approach assessed on effectiveness.
Yes. Risk factors and weights are configurable, so ratings reflect the methodology your business has adopted rather than a fixed template.
The product is the same. This page covers how it applies in Japan: the FSA's expectation of a rating for every customer, rating-driven review, and the portfolio view of a finding. The global page describes the product for every market.
A short walkthrough of screening, verification and ongoing monitoring in one platform, set to the thresholds and jurisdictions your programme actually uses.