Japan · Business due diligence

Know Your Business Checks for Companies in Japan

Verify Japanese and foreign corporate customers, trace ownership through to the natural person in control, and screen the entity and its owners in one record.

Last updated

What this covers

  • Company verification against registry data
  • Ownership traced to the controlling natural person
  • Beneficial owner (実質的支配者) identification
  • Entity, owner and officer screening
  • Evidence kept with the decision

Screening in production for

  • BancABC
  • BMG
  • BTC
  • CMC Markets
  • Coop
  • CSC
  • EFICA
  • EML
  • Groupama
  • MEO
  • Riskified
  • Securiport
  • Tanzania Commercial Bank
  • Tradeview Markets
  • Zappit
  • AMP
The Japan-specific problem

The first shareholder is rarely the answer.

Beneficial ownership transparency was one of the areas FATF rated weak in Japan's 2021 mutual evaluation, and the Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds asks firms to reach the natural person behind a corporate customer. For a group with parents and holding companies outside Japan, that means following ownership across borders and keeping the evidence for each layer, not recording a parent company and stopping.

Beneficial owner verification in Japan
  • Layered ownership mapped through to the controlling natural person
  • Representative authority evidenced by the document Japanese law accepts
  • Foreign PEP control of an entity flagged, making its transactions high risk
  • Stronger ownership evidence required where the transaction is high risk
Capabilities

What you get.

Ownership traced to a person

Japanese law requires beneficial ownership to be traced through to the natural person who controls the legal person, not stopped at the first corporate shareholder. Ownership structures are mapped layer by layer until they reach a person.

Authority to act, evidenced

Where an employee acts for a company, an employee ID card is not accepted as proof of authority; a letter of attorney or a certificate of registered matters naming them is. The document relied on is kept with the file.

Entity and owner screening

The company, its beneficial owners and its officers are screened against sanctions, PEP and adverse media data in the same record, because a foreign PEP controlling a company makes that company's transactions high risk.

Stricter checks where risk is higher

For high-risk transactions, Japanese law expects a shareholder register or securities report to confirm beneficial ownership rather than a declaration alone. Workflows can require that evidence before a case closes.

Entity risk indicators

Registration status, structure and screening results feed the entity's risk rating, so the level of review follows the risk rather than a single standard check.

Scope

What you can screen.

  • Corporate customers and their registered details
  • Beneficial owners and controlling persons
  • Representatives acting for the company
  • Officers and owners on screening lists
  • Changes in ownership after onboarding
130+
Countries and states covered
300+
Registry and data sources
1,000+
Registry document types
24h
Watchlist refresh cycle
Assurance

What your security review will ask for.

99.98%
System uptime
<24h
Average integration time
24–48h
Signed to production account
<1s
Average screening response
  • ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certifiedISO/IEC 27001:2022Information security management, independently audited.
  • ISO/IEC 27701:2019 certifiedISO/IEC 27701:2019Privacy information management, extending ISO 27001.
  • GDPR — EU General Data Protection RegulationGDPRPersonal data handled to EU standards, wherever you operate.
  • DORA — EU Digital Operational Resilience ActDORAOperational resilience for EU financial entities and their vendors.
Questions

Common questions.

How far does beneficial ownership have to be traced in Japan?

To the natural person who controls the legal person. Article 4 of the Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds does not allow the check to stop at the first corporate shareholder.

What proves someone can act for a Japanese company?

A letter of attorney, or a certificate of registered matters naming them as a representative officer. An employee ID card on its own is not accepted as proof of authority.

Which Japanese registry sources are covered?

Registry coverage varies by country and data source. Talk to our team about the Japanese and cross-border registry data your onboarding needs, and we will confirm what is available for your use case.

How is this different from the global KYB page?

The product is the same. This page covers how it applies to corporate customers in Japan: tracing beneficial owners under Japanese law, evidencing authority to act, and the stricter checks for high-risk transactions. The global page describes the product for every market.

See MemberCheck in action.

A short walkthrough of screening, verification and ongoing monitoring in one platform, set to the thresholds and jurisdictions your programme actually uses.