Configurable matching
Name match type, close-match threshold and secondary identifiers are yours to set, not ours.
Screen customers and entities against global sanctions, PEP, watchlist and enforcement data, with matching you tune and daily ongoing monitoring.
Screening in production for
Screening against more sources is the easy part. The cost is what arrives afterwards: an analyst hour spent clearing a coincidental name match. Matching is yours to tune, so weak matches drop out before anyone reads them.
Name match type, close-match threshold and secondary identifiers are yours to set, not ours.
Screen one customer through the API, or upload a CSV or XML batch file. Same lists, same logic.
Names on the monitoring list are re-screened daily, and in full again at each subscription renewal.
Decisions, comments, risk levels and their history stay recorded against each profile.
RESTful API runs screening inside onboarding and core systems, with callbacks for monitoring changes.
Yes. You set the name match type, the close-match threshold and how far secondary identifiers such as date of birth, gender, nationality and ID number narrow the results, so weak coincidental matches are filtered while genuine hits still surface.
Both. Screen one customer at onboarding through the API for a sub-second response, or upload the whole book as a CSV or XML batch file. Both paths use the same lists and the same matching logic.
Yes. Entities you add to the monitoring list are re-screened daily, so a previously cleared customer is reviewed again when a new listing or a profile change affects them. Paused and removed entities stop being checked.
Yes. A PEP jurisdiction policy includes or excludes PEP and close-associate profiles by country, which is how firms filter domestic politically exposed people when their risk picture does not require them. The setting is configured by your Compliance Officer.
Yes. Enter an email address with the individual and the result adds a list of known data breaches for that address — supplementary intelligence, not a regulatory KYC requirement.
MemberCheck screens against over 1,000 sanctions, PEP, and watchlist sources, refreshed on a 24-hour cycle, covering 195 countries. The full list of covered lists is visible to your team in the List Access screen.
FATF Recommendation 12 splits PEPs three ways: foreign PEPs holding a prominent public function in another country, domestic PEPs holding one at home, and people entrusted with a prominent function by an international organisation. Jurisdictions apply the categories differently, so a customer in scope in one country may not be in another.
Yes. A PEP's family members and close associates are screened as part of the same check, because they are the obvious route for holding assets at one remove. Former PEPs and Profiles of Interest carry the same related-risk logic after office.
Screening covers the major consolidated regimes — OFAC, the United Nations Security Council, the European Union and HM Treasury — alongside law-enforcement, regulatory-enforcement and national lists. Coverage by country is set out on the country coverage pages.
Close name matching uses phonetic algorithms and fuzzy search on Latin names, and an Original Script Name field takes Arabic, Cyrillic, Chinese, Korean or Japanese text directly, since transliterated names rarely match character for character. Secondary identifiers narrow what remains.
A regulator asks what was screened, what matched, what the analyst concluded and on what evidence. Each match keeps its source list, score, the identifiers used, its assignee and the decision that closed it, so the record answers the question without reconstruction.
Yes. Settings can be preset per organisation or suborganisation and left user-defined for authorised staff, so the threshold follows the segment's risk instead of one average across the whole book. A single threshold either buries analysts in noise or sets the bar too high.
The experience of using the MemberCheck service has been excellent, particularly due to the batch scan feature. It is very easy to use, and the delivery of results is remarkably fast, no matter the number of cases scanned. I was also impressed by the recently added feature, which enables us to preview the batch file before scanning. We can now predetermine if there are any issues with the details of our batch file.
We at Paynetics are delighted to share our great experience with Membercheck as a service provider for our AML screening processes, which proved to be a reliable partner, understanding our business needs, providing uninterrupted service and excellent client support. Amongst all providers we have partnered with, Membercheck has one of the most comprehensive approaches towards PEPs & Sanctions and has supported us in creating a controlled and fully compliant infrastructure for our fintech solutions.
Fexco operates in nearly 8 pacific countries & our FX system does not have an inbuilt PEP screening & due to the large number of transactions that we process MemberCheck is perfect for us. Also, it easy for me to conduct training as it's simple & straight forward.
I have been using MemberCheck for over a year, initially using its classic interface. The features I particularly like are being able to stay on the same page to view multiple profiles using four different viewing options, and the ability to drag-and-drop a file in order to perform batch scans. Overall, I have enjoyed the new MemberCheck experience and I highly recommend transitioning to its new modernised platform.
DDH Graham has used the MemberCheck service for more than five years and it has become an essential part of the toolkit we use in providing a leading edge administration service to our superannuation clients. Seamlessly integrated into our member registry platform, MemberCheck provides us and our clients with the security that all of our AML compliance goals are being met.